Well, well, well...just as I suspected none of the DNA gathered from the 46 lacrosse team members matches anything on the victim, so did she make it up. Bill's top story guest, Wendy Murphy, a former sex crimes defender thinks that the trial should go on. She disagrees with Andrew Napalitono, who said that the trial should not happen because of the recent updates. Murphy points out that two of the boys' DNA matches sexual DNA founds on some towels in the bathroom and that there is still vaginal bruises to be considered. However, Bill brings about an even better point--this case will be hard to prove because guilt has to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. The bruises were there before the night of the alleged rape, DNA in someone's bathroom is going to be there no matter what, it is a bathroom and the newest developement: the dancer was not paid and she was booted. So now that the issue of money comes into play, that certainly hurts her case. I have thought from the very beginning that this woman was making this whole thing up. Now, I could be wrong, but it is starting to look like I have a point. Bill does not state either way, but is clear on the fact that there is a doubt here. Murphy went on and on and would not shut up forcing Bill to do it for her. I will keep updating this Duke University situation, but I am beginning to think I was right, however, I will be the first to admit if I am wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment